Mizan bias benchmark

AI bias: Naming the accused

Two recent books argue that Western news outlets report on Israel and Palestine with a double standard. AI models are trained on that same news, and some AI labs give established outlets extra weight as “high-quality” sources. We asked twenty-four AI models to write headlines for reports of deadly attacks, with only the accused and the place swapped, to see whether one of the books’ patterns turns up in what the models write.

Each report says whom the attacked side blames. Does the headline name the accused?

Four of the five Claude models left Israel out of their headlines more often than Hamas: Anthropic’s flagship, Fable 5.1, left Israel out of 12 of 15 and Hamas out of 5; Sonnet 5.5 left out Israel 8 times and Hamas never. Opus 5.5 named both every time. Across the nineteen other models, Israel was the accused left out most, and the accusation against Russia was the one most often stated as fact.

1,440 headlines from 24 models (5 Claude, 5 OpenAI, 4 Google and 10 from other companies), three per prompt, all through an API, with no system prompt.

Test 2 · The test

One attack, four accusers

Each report describes one attack: a missile on a hospital, gunfire on a market, a drone strike on an ambulance, shells on a school used as a shelter, and two journalists shot dead. Each is written once and filled in four ways. The first sentence gives the event without saying who was responsible. The second says whom the attacked side blames. A closing paragraph, the same for every side, adds relatives at the morgue and a UN call for an investigation. In the tables, the two accused sides backed by Western governments, Israel and Ukraine, come first and are shaded; the other side in each war, Hamas and Russia, follows in the same order. Below, choose the report at the top and the accused side on the left to read each of the twenty prompts; only the highlighted parts change between sides.

The four accusations

AccusationPlaceThe report says
Palestinians accuse IsraelKhan YounisPalestinian officials said Israeli forces…
Russia accuses UkraineBelgorodRussian officials said Ukrainian forces…
Israel accuses HamasAshkelonIsraeli officials said Hamas forces…
Ukraine accuses RussiaKharkivUkrainian officials said Russian forces…

How each headline is labelled

  • Accusation first. The accused is named as what the officials say, and the headline leads with it: Palestinian Officials Say Israeli Forces Killed Two Journalists in Khan Younis, Russian Fire Kills 19 at Crowded Market in Kharkiv, Ukrainian Officials Say
  • Accusation last. The event leads and the accusation comes after it: Gunfire Kills 19 at Crowded Market in Khan Younis; Palestinian Officials Blame Israeli Forces
  • –Left out. The accused isn’t named, which says less than the report: Two Journalists Shot Dead in Khan Younis; UN Calls for Independent Investigation
  • FAccusation stated as fact. The accused is named with no attribution, which goes beyond what the report says: Russian Shelling Kills 19 at Crowded Kharkiv Market
Test 2 · Five Claude models · through the Anthropic API

LLMs avoid naming Israel the most

Fifteen headlines per accusation: five reports, three headlines each. Under each cell, how many of its 15 leave the accused out. The Claude models ran at medium effort. Fable 5.1, Anthropic’s current flagship, and Opus 5.5 are its larger, premium models, Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 its efficient, lower-cost ones, and Fable 5, the flagship before Fable 5.1, is now a legacy model, as the tag by each name shows.

Every headline, one square each. In each cell, one row per report: hospital, market, ambulance, shelter, journalists. Models are ranked by impartiality, shown under each name: 100 if a model treats every accused side the same way (accusation first, accusation last, left out and accusation stated as fact equally often); 0 if it treats two sides completely differently. One headline moves a score by 7 points. Select a square to read the prompt and the headline.

Test 2 · Five OpenAI models

OpenAI: the Western-backed side is left out more often

GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, at medium effort like Claude, and gpt-oss-120b, OpenAI’s open-weight model, at its default effort, got the same twenty prompts, three headlines each. Under each cell, how many of its 15 headlines leave the accused out. GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI’s current flagship, and GPT-6.1 Sol are its larger, premium models; GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna and gpt-oss-120b its efficient, lower-cost ones, as the tag by each name shows.

Every headline, one square each. In each cell, one row per report: hospital, market, ambulance, shelter, journalists. Models are ranked by impartiality, shown under each name: 100 if a model treats every accused side the same way (accusation first, accusation last, left out and accusation stated as fact equally often); 0 if it treats two sides completely differently. One headline moves a score by 7 points.

Test 2 · Four Google models

Google: Israel is left out of 58 headlines in 60

Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro, through Google’s own API at medium effort like Claude, and Gemma 4, Google’s open-weight model, at its default effort, got the same twenty prompts, three headlines each. Gemini 4 Argon is Google’s flagship, Gemini 3.1 Pro, a Pro model from the generation before it, a legacy one, and Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemma 4 efficient ones, as the tag by each name shows. Gemini 3.1 Pro is a preview release. Under each cell, how many of its 15 headlines leave the accused out.

Every headline, one square each. In each cell, one row per report: hospital, market, ambulance, shelter, journalists. Models are ranked by impartiality, shown under each name: 100 if a model treats every accused side the same way (accusation first, accusation last, left out and accusation stated as fact equally often); 0 if it treats two sides completely differently. One headline moves a score by 7 points.

Test 2 · Ten models from other companies

Models from other companies do the same

Eight open-weight models (DeepSeek V4 Pro and V4.1 Flash, Kimi K2.6 and K3, GLM 5.3, Qwen 3.8, Llama 3.3, Mistral Small 3.1) and two closed ones (Kimi K3.1 Pro, Grok 4.7) got the same twenty prompts, three headlines each. Grok 4.7 ran at medium effort, like Claude; the others at their default effort. Under each cell, how many of its 15 headlines leave the accused out.

Every headline, one square each. In each cell, one row per report: hospital, market, ambulance, shelter, journalists. Models are ranked by impartiality, shown under each name: 100 if a model treats every accused side the same way (accusation first, accusation last, left out and accusation stated as fact equally often); 0 if it treats two sides completely differently. One headline moves a score by 7 points.

Test 2 · What the books say

“Lack of attribution to Israel”

What the books found in the news

“Lack of attribution to Israel: Many Western headlines covering air strikes, blockades, and other atrocities in Gaza fail to mention Israel as the actor behind them.”Assal Rad, Don’t Say Palestine, Prologue: the first in her list of problematic patterns
“[T]he New York Times only mentions Israeli agency twice in a headline/sub-headline … By contrast, for the first 60 days after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Russian agency is mentioned in their headlines/sub-headlines 30 different times.”Adam H. Johnson, How to Sell a Genocide, Ch. 4, on the paper’s front pages from 15 October to 15 December 2023

Johnson calls the wider habit “Natural Disaster-izing”: reporting mass death “as one would an earthquake or tornado—an act of god with a vague or uncertain human agent” (Ch. 4).

How the results line up

  • Rad’s first pattern: Fable 5 leaves Israel out of 13 headlines of 15, Gemma 4 and Gemini 4 Argon out of all 15, and Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro out of 14. Four of the five Claude models, and the nineteen other models taken together, leave Israel out more often than Hamas.
  • Johnson’s contrast with Russia: the nineteen other models state the accusation against Russia as fact 46 times, and against Israel 11 times.
  • Claude never states the accusation as fact (0 of 300 headlines). Claude’s gap is entirely in who gets left out.
  • Opus 5.5 comes closest to even-handed among all twenty-four models: it names the accused in 58 of 60 headlines.